When prohibiting places the offender can go near, what must the court describe?

The correct answer highlights the necessity for the court to clearly define both the prohibited locations and the conditions when it comes to restricting where an offender can go. This requirement ensures that the boundaries set by the court are specific and unambiguous, allowing the offender to understand exactly where they are not allowed to go and under what circumstances these restrictions apply.

Detailing both the locations and conditions provides clarity, avoiding potential confusion about what is permissible. This is crucial for law enforcement and for the offender to adhere to the court's ruling. By outlining specific locations, the court protects victims and maintains public safety, while specifying conditions reinforces the parameters of the prohibition.

The other choices do not encompass the full scope of requirements for such prohibitions. For instance, mentioning only the nature of the offense fails to provide the offender with necessary spatial parameters. Restricting the answer to just the minimum distance to each location lacks the necessary context of what those locations are. Limiting the description to only victims' names neglects the need to specify where the offender is barred from going, which is essential for practical enforcement of the court’s order.